Last week, Matt Kremnitzer wrote an article about the Orioles bullpen in which he compared the 2012 bullpen to the 2014
bullpen. In this article he included a chart comparing certain statistics of
the 2012 and 2014 bullpen and noted the results have been reasonably similar even
if the 2012 bullpen has been better.
I was thinking about this article and how it
measured bullpen performance. Bullpen performance is typically measured by
taking the results for each reliever and weighting them by the number of
innings pitched by that reliever. Two relievers that each threw sixty innings
would have the same amount of weight when determining reliever performance. A
reliever that throws sixty innings would have twice the weight as one that
threw thirty innings.
The problem with this method is that it
presumes that all relievers in the bullpen should be treated equally. I'm not sure I would do that because it’s only logical that the performance of a closer is
more important than the performance of a long man. The closer usually comes
into games in the ninth inning when the game is close while the long man comes
into the game considerably earlier when the game isn’t close. If the long man
gives up a run then little harm is done but if the closer allows a run then it
could lead to a blown save and a loss. Teams would rather have a closer with a
0 ERA than a long man with a 0 ERA and it only makes sense to reflect that in
bullpen performance. All relievers aren’t equal and it’s necessary to find some
method of ensuring that the most important relievers have the most value in
these calculations.
Tom Tango developed a statistic called leverage index (LI). This statistic measures how important a particular
situation is in a baseball game depending on the inning, score, outs, and
number of players on base. It is possible to use this statistic to determine
which relievers have been used in the most important situations and therefore
which relievers are most valuable. This allows us to quantify the difference
between a closer and a long man. The leverage index most commonly used is one
that measures a player’s average LI for all game events known as pLI. In fact,
Fangraphs uses this leverage index when determining pitching WAR. Another
leverage index is called gmLI. This index measures a pitchers average LI when
he enters the game. I personally believe that gmLI is a better metric than pLI
and will therefore use gmLI in this article.
Fangraphs provides the gmLI for each reliever. It is
possible to use this statistic to weight bullpen performance by the importance
of each pitcher as well as by innings thrown which should result in a more
accurate measure of bullpen performance than considering each pitcher to be of
equal performance regardless of role. We can use this statistic to see how the
Orioles 2014 bullpen compares to other teams bullpens. In addition, I’m only
using relievers on an active roster because Orioles’ fans are excited about
their current relievers. Orioles’ and other teams’ fans couldn’t care less
about guys like Evan Meek.
This table shows the number of pitchers used by each
bullpen, the bullpen’s ERA without using leverage, the bullpen’s ERA using
leverage and the difference between the two.
Team
|
Pitchers
|
Non-Leveraged ERA
|
Leverage ERA
|
Difference
|
Rays
|
10
|
3.12
|
3.14
|
-0.02
|
Mets
|
11
|
3.01
|
3.02
|
-0.01
|
Mariners
|
11
|
2.49
|
2.49
|
0.00
|
Tigers
|
18
|
4.28
|
4.24
|
0.04
|
Marlins
|
14
|
3.07
|
3.02
|
0.05
|
Giants
|
10
|
2.65
|
2.60
|
0.05
|
Twins
|
11
|
3.33
|
3.25
|
0.07
|
Blue Jays
|
16
|
3.75
|
3.66
|
0.09
|
Orioles
|
12
|
3.07
|
2.99
|
0.09
|
Rockies
|
15
|
4.84
|
4.74
|
0.10
|
Athletics
|
12
|
2.72
|
2.62
|
0.10
|
Indians
|
14
|
2.84
|
2.72
|
0.12
|
Astros
|
16
|
4.85
|
4.73
|
0.12
|
Nationals
|
12
|
2.81
|
2.69
|
0.13
|
Yankees
|
16
|
3.33
|
3.19
|
0.13
|
Braves
|
14
|
3.19
|
3.06
|
0.14
|
White Sox
|
16
|
4.28
|
4.14
|
0.14
|
Diamondbacks
|
15
|
3.75
|
3.60
|
0.15
|
Padres
|
12
|
2.39
|
2.22
|
0.18
|
Rangers
|
23
|
3.96
|
3.76
|
0.20
|
Cardinals
|
14
|
3.68
|
3.48
|
0.20
|
Cubs
|
15
|
3.45
|
3.24
|
0.21
|
Brewers
|
15
|
3.56
|
3.31
|
0.24
|
Angels
|
20
|
2.96
|
2.70
|
0.26
|
Pirates
|
14
|
3.40
|
3.10
|
0.29
|
Reds
|
12
|
3.96
|
3.58
|
0.38
|
Red Sox
|
14
|
3.27
|
2.82
|
0.45
|
Dodgers
|
13
|
3.75
|
3.27
|
0.48
|
Phillies
|
14
|
3.67
|
3.19
|
0.48
|
Royals
|
15
|
3.18
|
2.38
|
0.79
|
Using this method shows the strength of the Royals bullpen.
The Royals have only three relievers that have pitched over ten innings with a
gmLI over 1.1. All three of those relievers have an ERA under 2. The backend of
the Royals bullpen has been dominant and as a result their bullpen ERA using
leverage is considerably lower than their bullpen ERA not considering leverage.
Likewise, the Phillies have had Papelbon and Adams pitch most of their high
leverage innings and both of them have low ERAs. This method makes them look
better than they would otherwise.
This does little to explain why people should excited about
the Orioles bullpen. While our leveraged ERA is 2.99 this is only good for
tenth in the majors. The difference between our leveraged bullpen ERA and
non-leveraged bullpen ERA is miniscule and one of the lowest in the majors. In addition, the 2012 bullpen is still better then the 2014 bullpen even when considering leverage.
Fortunately, this next table may answer this question. This
table consists of the team name and the average leverage of the bullpen and
shows that the Orioles bullpen has the second highest game leverage.
Team
|
Average Leverage
|
Rangers
|
0.997
|
Blue Jays
|
1.010
|
Dodgers
|
1.019
|
Padres
|
1.023
|
Giants
|
1.050
|
Nationals
|
1.071
|
Twins
|
1.077
|
Astros
|
1.087
|
Royals
|
1.090
|
Athletics
|
1.106
|
Brewers
|
1.115
|
Tigers
|
1.117
|
Indians
|
1.120
|
Rockies
|
1.121
|
Cubs
|
1.156
|
Mets
|
1.165
|
Diamondbacks
|
1.181
|
Pirates
|
1.184
|
Mariners
|
1.191
|
Phillies
|
1.193
|
Angels
|
1.194
|
Reds
|
1.224
|
Marlins
|
1.229
|
Rays
|
1.231
|
Cardinals
|
1.252
|
White Sox
|
1.270
|
Red Sox
|
1.286
|
Braves
|
1.312
|
Orioles
|
1.340
|
Yankees
|
1.387
|
Orioles fans are excited about their bullpen because it has done well in high pressure situations. As I write this post, O'Day has just struck out Abreu and Garcia with runners at first and second to maintain a one run lead while Britton had a one-two-three ninth to pick up his 27th save despite having little margin for error with just a one run lead. The Orioles have needed their bullpen to come through in the clutch this season and it has met the challenge. As a result, the Orioles are in excellent position to clinch the division and fans are showing their bullpen the love.
1 comment:
I feel better about a 2014 Miller-O'Day-Britton backend of the bullpen come playoff time than a 2012 Strop-O'Day-Johnson combo. Easier to say in retrospect, for sure, but I won't be missing Ed Rodriguez when Miller is on the mound in the postseason.
Post a Comment