Showing posts with label Ian Kennedy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ian Kennedy. Show all posts

12 January 2016

The Money Is There. Where Is It?

As we settle into the final stages of free agent acquisition, the market begins to stabilize. First of all, several top tier talents remain available. To be elite and available in January is not an unusual thing. Ask Max Scherzer or Prince Fielder. However, to have as many perceived elite talents out there for hire is indeed unusual. According to STEAMER, Chris Davis, Howie Kendrick, Yoenis Cespedes, Justin Upton, Wei-Yin Chen, and Ian Kennedy are all present and stand to be worth more than two wins for 2016. Six players stand to make about 18 MM apiece (a total of 108 MM for 2016). That is a great deal of talent to change the outlook of the league without mentioning mid-range talents like Ian Desmond, Yovani Gallardo, and others. In all, STEAMER project 54.4 loose wins remaining, a value of about 380 MM. Complicating the matter is that many teams in search of talent have spent a great deal of money, which might have caused the market to constrict significantly.

Of course, available talent though does not equal available money. If there are 12 apples whose intrinsic value is a dollar while only six dollars are available in the market, then those apples will likely sell for less than they are worth. We do not know how much money each franchise has, but we can guess. To arrive at a reasonable answer for this, payrolls from 2013, 2014, and 2015 were assessed for change over time. This change could then be used to estimate what might be the overall pool of money available for 2016. Estimated current total payroll for 2016 is $3,747,200, which is a 1.01% increase over last year. Should we expect more?
Payroll % 
2013 3150500
2014 3396200 7.80%
2015 3709800 9.23%
p2016 4025875 8.52%
If that 8.52% increase happens, then we have about 280 MM in open spending available. With overall talent at 380 MM, it looks like it might shape up to be an incredible buyer's market, which was something we thought Dan Duquette would be angling for this offseason. Also, the rumors about players considering one-year deals, punting a season, and then resetting for the 2016/17 offseason make a bit more sense. It must have someone like Chris Davis thinking twice about rejecting the 7/154 offer he had on the table or why he is refusing that offer if it is indeed still there.

Using the generic 8.52% increase over 2015 payroll marks might help us understand who exactly is in play for major talent. To note, this is generic because we are not considering whether 2015 was an abnormality in excess or under payment. Additionally, we do not know if resources are being redirected for immediate play or to support future franchises fortunes. Off the bat though, we have several teams that appear to be out of the game: Toronto (13.5 MM above 2015 + 8.52% payroll), Cleveland (22.5 MM), Angels (24 MM), Oakland 13.4 MM), Arizona (28.5 MM), Chicago (37.9 MM), St. Louis (4.1 MM), and New York Mets (1.3 MM). These eight teams seem, at a glance, out of the running for any of the top-tier talent.

What are the team needs of the 22 other clubs based on STEAMER projections?
(x denotes minor need as defined by 25th to 50th percentile; X denotes major need as defined by 1st to 25th percentile):


Team C 1 2 3 S LF CF RF SP
NYY x
Baltimore x X x XXX
Tampa XX x
Boston x x x
Kansas City XX x X
Twins x X x x x x x
Chicago AL x XX x X
Detroit x X x XXX
Texas x x x X
Houston XX x x
Seattle x x x X
Colorado x XX x x X x x
San Diego x x XXXXX x
San Francisco x
LAD x
Cincinatti x x x X x X x
Milwaukee XXX x x X
Pittsburgh XX
Philadelphia XXX x XXXX
Atlanta XXXXXXXX
Miami XX x XX
Washington x x X

The data provided by STEAMER is slightly dated. For instance, it is difficult to portray Washington as having a great need in center field when they have just acquired Ben Revere. However, the data is nearly up to date and gives us a good indication of roughly where clubs are at the moment (as of Alex Gordon's re-signing).

First Base
The Orioles offered Chris Davis 7/154, BORAS model projected 5/110, and the Comp model thinks 5/91 makes sense. Regardless, he is a near 20 MM first baseman (even though the actual Boras is trying to sell him as an outfield option). Teams with great need at first base include Tampa Bay, Minnesota, Houston, Colorado, Milwaukee, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, and Miami. Of those, it is difficult to see Tampa or Pittsburgh putting out the money from a payroll perspective. Meanwhile, entrenched veterans exist in Minnesota (Joe Mauer), Milwaukee (the newly signed Chris Carter), and Philadelphia (Ryan Howard with Darin Ruf and Maikel Franco making future noise). This leaves us with Houston and Miami as the most sensible destinations. A team that really values Davis, like the Orioles, seemingly has pretty much these two clubs as primary competitors. My guess is that Houston would be reluctant to meet Baltimore's price and may well be waiting on the Orioles to make a move elsewhere and then swoop in with a low offer to Davis. Houston right now looks weak only at catcher and first base, so Davis makes a great deal of sense. Miami? Who knows? They could have something up their sleeve. That said, Miami also has weakness at catcher, shortstop, and starting pitcher. As it stands, Miami likely only has payroll to acquire one elite player.
Likely Destinations: Baltimore, Houston, Miami

Second Base
The second base market has been a bit quiet since Ben Zobrist signed, and Howie Kendrick is Mr. Incognito. A solid second baseman, but someone who has not been heard of much this offseason. Based on the clubs with cash and STEAMER, the weakest clubs appear to be Baltimore, Kansas City, Colorado, San Diego, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, and Atlanta. That hurts for Kendrick. Baltimore appears to be quite happy to see how Jonathan Schoop develops. Kansas City has fringe options in Omar Infante and Christian Colon and appears to be largely disinterested in the infield market. They could be a landing place for a one-year bid. Colorado has larger troubles and appears content with D.J. LeMahieu to continue on. San Diego could be a spot when the dust clears. They have a number of weaknesses and should be looking at player to fall off to the floor. Milwaukee likes Scooter Gennett, the Phillies are in no place to compete and are working with Cesar Hernandez, and the Braves likewise have too many holes and a promising 2B in Jace Peterson. With all of that said, it looks like the Royals and, moreso, the Padres are the two openings. Both appear to be one-year deal scenarios, but the Padres could commit longer.
Likely Destinations: Kansas City, San Diego

Corner Outfield
The big paydays predicted for Yoenis Cespedes and Justin Upton have lost some of their shininess. The list here is not exactly as long as one might think: Baltimore, Chicago (AL), Detroit, San Diego, Cincinnati, Philadelphia, and Atlanta. To mention previous points, Cincinnati, Philadelphia, and Atlanta appear to be dedicated to rebuilding and signing a player descending from peak value seems doubtful. If there is cash to burn, there is an extreme scenario where one of these clubs signs a Qualifying Offer player, hands over a second-round pick as their first-round picks are protected, and either moves up with a compensation pick or deals said player at the trade deadline. A move up in draft selection looks like a waste of money spent, but a deal for prospects could help jump-start the rebuild a little and make it worth sinking 10 MM for half a season.

More realistically, these two players will wind up in Baltimore, Chicago (AL), Detroit, or San Diego. After San Diego pushed their budget far, plopping down 20 MM for one of these guys might be too much, too soon. They have not been attached in the papers with an elite free agent, so it might well be that they are in the sub-15 MM market (such as Ian Desmond). For the others, they have each been mentioned in passing with either/both Cespedes and Upton. Baltimore may find themselves in a situation where it is difficult to choose because they could finalize deals with Cespedes, Upton, or Davis and only have Houston, Chicago (AL), and Detroit as primary competition. Perhaps Baltimore is the domino. It makes sense now that Alex Gordon re-signed with Kansas City because this market could wind up looking bad for someone.
Likely Destinations: Baltimore, Chicago (AL), Detroit

Starting Pitching
This is another area where the market is not as great as it might appear for Wei-Yin Chen and Ian Kennedy. Of course, it always seems like an unknown team will launch themselves into the void to secure a stronger pitching rotation (again see Max Scherzer), but how often might that happen? As it stands, we have Baltimore, Kansas City, Detroit, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, Atlanta, and Miami. It is hard to see Milwaukee, Philadelphia, or Atlanta stepping into this negotiation. As they are all in rebuilding mode, starting pitchers tend to be poor options for those clubs. Starting pitchers primarily provide value their first season (~90% give more than 100 IP), but break down in the years following (~50% give more than 100 IP in year two or three or etc. afterward).

As it stands, Baltimore, Kansas City, Detroit, and Miami are the primary players one might think based on the above methodology. We know Baltimore is in the market and has been circling Gallardo. Ian Kennedy makes a great deal of sense for them as well, but it makes one wonder if they can fit two 20 MM players on their roster. Kansas City appears to have pieced together a rotation, but would like to push Danny Duffy or Kris Medlen to a sixth starter role. It is questionable whether they are planning on any more splurges after Gordon. Detroit and Miami are options. Detroit is being pushed in a few ways, but I doubt they want anyone significant after signing Jordan Zimmermann. That leaves Miami who has been the most noticeable in their quest to secure Chen.
Likely Destinations: Baltimore, Miami

Slightly Informed Projections
So where will everyone go? My choice yet is for everyone to find a need that meets their interests. Here we go.

Chris Davis, Houston Astros
The Astros have one big need and that is first base. This fit seems to make a great deal of sense and might well happen. Davis has been a major target of Peter Angelos, but after a while someone saying no to 154 MM gets frustrating.

Howie Kendrick, San Diego Padres
I do not know whether this would be a one-year deal (which I think would make more teams interested) or a multi-year deal. One might think ownership would be concerned after devoting so much money to older players last offseason.

Yoenis Cespedes, Baltimore Orioles
Justin Upton makes more sense for the Orioles with his youth, but his youth makes it likely a player option or two would be involved. Those things apparently make Dan Duquette mad. Cespedes is old enough where opt outs stop making as much sense. Cespedes also has a much better arm and range than Upton, fitting in more with the Orioles' defensive goals. The Orioles may also like that Cespedes will not cost them a draft pick for signing him.

Justin Upton, Chicago White Sox
While there has been no mention of Upton to the White Sox, this seems to make sense once Baltimore settles in on Cespedes. The White Sox are probably more willing to offer a player option. Detroit, in my opinion, will rest on their laurels as their payroll is nearing luxury tax levels.

Wei-Yin Chen, Miami Marlins
The Marlins have cash, have been highly associated with Chen, and he seems to be a great fit for them. I would also assume that Chen, who lives outside the United States, would not be all that bothered if Miami went and traded him elsewhere after a couple seasons.

Ian Kennedy, Kansas City Royals
This scenario has the Royals coming in unexpectedly to beef up their rotation with a short-term deal for Kennedy. If Orioles secure Upton over Cespedes, then I think they will be more willing to let go of a second-round pick to ink Kennedy to a deal in a similar vein to Ubaldo Jimenez'.

At the end of the day, a lot can happen. The Yankees may think they need to tighten up right field. Boston might determine they can spin some players around and get a proven left fielder. Rangers ownership could do a 180 on their stance about not significantly raising payroll. Regardless, all of these should be answered in the next four weeks.

26 October 2015

Rumor Has It...2016 Orioles Edition (10/26/15)

Click here for Jon Shepherd's archive.

This series considers briefly players who have been connected to the Orioles by the press.  You can find previous post here.

This post considers players mentioned in:
A Look at a Few Pitchers..., Steve Melewski
Click here for previous Rumors posts.

The growing mantra being leaked out of the Orioles front office is that the club was to shore up its starting rotation.  It is uncertain if Melewski was fed these names or if through his own experience finds these pitchers as probable for the Orioles to focus on.  Regardless, we will address them here.

Marco Estrada, RHSP
Arbitration Eligible: No
Currently Under Contract: No
Qualifying Offer: Unlikely
Projected Contract: 4 / 44 MM
Fastball: 89 mph, Curveball: 77 mph, Changeup: 79 mph

Past Five Seasons:
Year
AgeWLERAIPERA+FIPBB9SO9bWARfWAR
2011
27
4
8
4.08
92.2
97
3.67
2.8
8.5
0.4
0.9
2012
28
5
7
3.64
138.1
113
3.35
1.9
9.3
1.5
3.3
2013
29
7
4
3.87
128.0
100
3.86
2.0
8.3
1.6
1.8
2014
30
7
6
4.36
150.2
87
4.88
2.6
7.6
0.6
-0.1
2015
31
13
8
3.13
181.0
126
4.40
2.7
6.5
3.6
1.8
8 Yrs
36
34
3.95
722.0
100
4.19
2.5
8.0
 
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 10/19/2015.

In our own series, it was suggested that Estrada could be had for four years around 32 MM, but the algorithm disagrees slightly.  If someone really believes Estrada is responsible for the poor contact off of him this year, then you will likely see this deal and maybe something richer.  As it stands, the word percolating throughout baseball is that Estrada is a fringe QO case.  The Blue Jays do not want him back at 15.8 MM, but Estrada could make serious money declining the option.

For the Orioles, he is another non-traditional pitcher for Camden Yards.  He has extreme fly ball percentages and actually led the National League in home runs allowed in 2014 even though he only threw 150.2 IP.  I would argue that a pitcher like Estrada is someone you would like to possess as an arbitration year player as opposed to a free agent where you must commit multiyear money.  To be blunt, I have no idea why anyone would prefer Estrada over Miguel Gonzalez or Chris Tillman.

Doug Fister, RHSP
Arbitration Eligible: No
Currently Under Contract: No
Qualifying Offer: Highly Unlikely
Projected Contract: 1 / 12 MM
Fastball (2S): 86 mph, Cutter: 82 mph, Curveball: 71 mph, Changeup: 79 mph

Past Five Seasons:
Year
AgeWLERAIPERA+FIPBB9SO9bWARfWAR
2011
27
11
13
2.83
216.1
138
3.02
1.5
6.1
2.5
5.1
2012
28
10
10
3.45
161.2
123
3.42
2.1
7.6
3.3
3.4
2013
29
14
9
3.67
208.2
113
3.26
1.9
6.9
4.1
4.2
2014
30
16
6
2.41
164.0
155
3.93
1.3
5.4
4.5
1.4
2015
31
5
7
4.19
103.0
96
4.55
2.1
5.5
0.2
0.2
7 Yrs
65
63
3.42
1085.2
117
3.62
1.8
6.1
 
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 10/19/2015.

Fister is another player whose recent struggles, lost velocity, and injury has taken what was once considered an easy payday into needing to reestablish value.  2014 saw the beginning of Fister losing velocity and seeking out a cutter a la Dan Haren.  This past season has seen Fister lose further velocity and rely a little bit more with a mix that includes the cutter.  The 2015 hiccup may simply be Fister learning to adapt or it may well be that he is no longer an elitish pitcher.

For the Orioles, the hope is more realistically attached to Fister learning how to use his current skill set as opposed to him regaining form, which would seem like a deus ex machina event at the moment.  The shadow of his former excellence is likely to push his value up an extra million or so, but it seems that other pitchers look a bit more promising as reclamations (read: Mat Latos).

Ian Kennedy, RHSP
Arbitration Eligible: No
Currently Under Contract: No
Qualifying Offer: Likely
Projected Contract: 1 / 7 MM
Fastball: 91 mph, Slider: 85 mph, Knuckle-Curve: 77 mph, Changeup: 83 mph

Past Five Seasons:
Year
AgeWLERAIPERA+FIPBB9SO9bWARfWAR
2011
26
21
4
2.88
222.0
137
3.22
2.2
8.0
4.8
4.8
2012
27
15
12
4.02
208.1
101
4.04
2.4
8.1
2.3
2.5
2013
28
7
10
4.91
181.1
76
4.59
3.6
8.1
-1.5
0.6
2014
29
13
13
3.63
201.0
93
3.21
3.1
9.3
1.4
3.5
2015
30
9
15
4.28
168.1
85
4.51
2.8
9.3
-0.4
0.8
9 Yrs
75
68
3.98
1234.2
97
3.99
3.0
8.3
 
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 10/19/2015.

The algorithm suggests Kennedy is a poor pitcher and it is based on how awful 2013 and 2015.  That said, some clubs are interested in him as a result of the poor catching the Padres provided their staff this year.  The thought is that with a more competent catcher framing pitches that Kennedy would excel.  That may well be what the Padres are thinking to be willing to put a QO on him as has been reported.  To that end, could Kennedy get 30+MM out of it?  Maybe.  If not, then he might well be the first player to accept a QO.  It is a difficult decision on his part because he could be worth 80+ MM if he had another catcher.

Would the Orioles be willing to cough up a draft pick to get Kennedy?  Maybe.  It would probably mean putting four years and 56 MM on the table.  It would make no sense to lose a pick on a one year deal.  A club will need to believe in Kennedy enough to go long term on him.  It requires a level of faith the Orioles showed with Jimenez, which has not quite worked out.

Conclusion

Put me down as a firm no on Estrada.  Again, maybe he has figured out how to skillfully defy FIP.  He has not shown this ability for a long period of time and his pitching style appears to not leave a great deal of wiggle room to maintain success.  As such, I would be fine with him on a one year deal and not expect much, but a multiyear commitment for someone on the fringe is a risk I would be uncomfortable with.  Fister better represents a risk worth the discomfort, but he contracts with Estrada in that he has not had recent success.

Kennedy would certainly be a more interesting arm.  Unfortunately, it comes with a probable loss of a draft pick.  At that point, one has to look at whether his inclusion from 2016 through 2019 or 2020 would be worth the lost pick.  Eventually, excluding yourself from the first round of the draft pool on a complete or partial basis eventually will impact a club's ability to sufficiently provide enough cost-controlled talent coming up through the farm.  Eventually, a club has to pay for that.  Is the team an Ian Kennedy away from the playoffs, I am not sure of that.  I certainly am not sure that the club would fail making the playoffs with a commodity like Fister in his place.