Showing posts with label Arrivals and Departures. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Arrivals and Departures. Show all posts

11 April 2017

Arrivals and Departures: Hope is a Person Named Alec Asher (3/11/17)

Orioles are attempting a shotgun approach
to finding a starting pitcher.
The season is young, but the club has provided a bit of evidence illustrating that Kevin Gausman, in flashes, and Dylan Bundy are both able to be true top of the rotation arms.  The year has also made many yearn for the quick and successful rehabilitation of rotation stalwart Chris Tillman with Wade Miley's improbable five shutout innings and Ubaldo Jimenez looking expectedly awful.  If there is one question mark for the Orioles season, it is that while the club has a rotation and Norfolk depth. that rotation and depth are cringe inducing.

To some extent, this situation is somewhat reflective of the dire straights of the 2012 season where the club opened up with Jake Arrieta, Tommy Hunter, Jason Hammel, Brian Matusz, and Wei Yin Chen as the starting rotation.  Arrieta, like Gausman, was considered ready to break out and achieve what everyone thought he could be (though, admittedly, Gausman is beginning this season with considerably more accomplished than Arrieta then).  Matusz, like Bundy, was a big question mark with a history of extraordinary praise.  Hammel, a Tillman type with less luster, was acquired from the Rockies for Jeremy Guthrie and was considered a stabilizing force.  Hunter and Chen were wishes and dreams (though I was a major Wei Yin Chen fan).

That season rolled into a major operation in damage control.  Arrieta, Hunter, and Matusz all washed out of the rotation with Hammel being shut down with injury.  The club frantically tried to find pieces to give the team some chance until it could hand things over to the bullpen.  The experienced left us with memories, some persistently scrubbed clean from our collective memory, of Dana Eveland (Dan Duquette had acquired Eveland in a trade and suggested he found some wondrous new pitch, which was kindly exaggerated), Zach Britton (who needed more than his old two seamer as a starting pitcher), Steve Johnson (who was Steve Johnson), Randy Wolf (who was no longer Randy Wolf), Miguel Gonzalez, Chris Tillman, and a resurrected Joe Saunders.  Strangely, having lived through it, I imagined that list to be about ten names longer.

Anyway, the carousel found incredibly useful pieces like Gonzalez and Tillman in the system as well as Saunders coming over cheaply with a salary exchange.  Let us assume that Tillman comes back in May and pitches something like he used to.  That would be big.  Beyond him, the club has the periodically respectable Ubaldo Jimenez and the frequently terrible Wade Miley.  Jimenez, being in his last year, is a short spell of wretched away from being released.  Miley may have some life as a southpaw bullpen arm if things fall apart, but I figure he has to be consistently awful to be jettisoned.  That might restrict opportunity for others down in Norfolk, but we full we expect opportunity to arise with Tillman's delay and a probable implosion by one pitcher or another.

Using a historical based projection model, we can throw some probabilities out there just to get a frame of reference about where each pitcher stands.  For Jimenez, the model is most excited about him by giving him a 5% chance of being a two slot pitcher.  No one else in this group has that in their expected range of possibilities.  It also thinks that there is a 55% chance that he is a bust. The field from which to choose from includes bullpen arm Tyler Wilson and minor leaguers Mike Wright, Jayson Aquino, Alec Asher, Richard Bleier, Logan Verrett, Gabriel Ynoa, and newly signed Edwin Jackson (who somehow is only 33 years old).  How does the model like them?
 
Bust
Usable
3 Slot
Tyler Wilson 70% 30% 0
Mike Wright 75% 25% 0
Jayson Aquino 75% 25% 0
Alec Asher 45% 55% 15%
Richard Bleier 85% 15% 0
Logan Verrett 85% 15% 0
Gabriel Ynoa 85% 15% 0
Edwin Jackson 75% 25% 0

*post print edit - Chris Lee is in the rotation in Norfolk, for now, the model sees him as a 95% SP bust.

For the most part, the numbers above are not all that exceptional.  For a bunch of retreads, we should expect a potential of about 1 in 4 chance that they could deliver some backend arm production.  Nothing too grand, but also much more likely to fail.  The hope is that the innings racked up in Norfolk can provide useful information as to which of these arms may actually pay out.  Duquette's drive to acquire pitchers with options may be very useful to keep a deep and fresh pen as well as maybe getting one more hitter on the bench, but could also provide a sandbox to see which of these arms were overlooked.

One name that surprisingly explodes off the page is Alec Asher.  He is a pitcher that is well known to scouts and well ignored.  The basic book on him is average.  He has average command.  Asher heavily uses his sinker to induce groundballs, but AAA hitters hit those groundballs very hard.  He has no offering that misses any bats.  That certainly is what his career looks like.
Register Pitching
Age Lev ERA IP H9 HR9 BB9 SO9
20A-3.0935.07.51.02.812.9
21A+2.90133.18.10.72.79.4
22AA3.80154.08.11.11.97.1
23AAA-AA3.97133.29.21.52.77.3
23MLB9.3129.013.02.53.15.0
24AA-AAA-Rk2.3764.26.70.81.46.4
24MLB2.2827.27.20.31.34.2
24FgW2.1442.05.80.41.14.5
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 4/6/2017.


Ages 23 and earlier, he appears as a pitcher who performs well  in his league, but looks troublesome as a big leaguer.  Strikeout rate collapsed each year and hit rate slowly increased with walk rate staying normal.  That is the general go of it, but a pitcher with a 3.1 walk rate and a 5.0 strikeout rate in the majors is quite less than desirable.  However, something strange happened last year.  Across levels and into the winter leagues, Asher simply dropped his hit rate by more than 20%.  When batters hit him, they hit him hard. Though, those batted balls found more and more gloves.

How?  Asher dedicated himself to his sinker last year.  MLB performance does not show it with a 38% ground ball rate, but he put up a 52% across all levels and in his winter league.  That is what the bet is on and what the model likes about Asher.  If somehow Asher can generate a 6 k/9 and a 2 bb/9 while delivering a 50% ground ball rate, then this is a pitcher who can fill out the backend of a rotation and, perhaps, even break out as a mid rotation arm. 

However, it seems unlikely.  Whatever Asher did in the minors, the only thing that appeared at the Major League level was a decrease in hits.  Major League hitters were able to avoid the groundballs and they did not miss the ball.  The ball simply turned into outs.  In Philadelphia, Asher had a .231 opponent BABIP, which would have led the league last year among qualified starting pitchers.  That knowledge in and of itself would suggest that there should be a major regression in store for him.  That would have been fifth best in baseball.

Maybe there is something there.  I do not believe it, but he is someone to look at to determine whether he might well be a pitcher that scouts miss.  The model likes him  though and the model, for some reason, thinks the hit rate will remain low.  To some extent, this was about how the model saw Miguel Gonzalez when he signed.  It brings the question whether this will be a rotation best experienced with strong faith or one where you set your expectations low enough to concern your parents.

40 Man Roster and Options
Usually, I break down the transactions since the last iteration, but it has been almost four months since then and so much has changed.

1
2
3
Options
Pitchers 
Jayson Aquino 3/12/2014 7/6/2016 4/2/2017 Yes
Alec Asher 7/31/2015 3/15/2016 3/30/2017 Yes
Richard Bleier 3/30/2017 Yes
Brad Brach 4/16/2012 5/18/2013 2/25/2014
Parker Bridwell 3/18/2016 3/8/2017 Yes
Zach Britton  3/29/2011 6/6/2012 3/23/2013
Dylan Bundy  3/16/2013 3/14/2014 3/16/2015
Miguel Castro 5/3/2015 6/25/2016 3/13/2017 Yes
Oliver Drake 3/15/2012 3/9/2015 3/31/2016
Andrew Faulkner 4/16/2016 3/6/2017 Yes
Jason Garcia 3/14/2016 3/8/2017 Yes
Kevin Gausman 6/13/2013 3/29/2014 6/21/2015
Mychal Givens 6/25/2015 Yes
Donnie Hart 7/24/2016 Yes
Ubaldo Jimenez NA
Chris Lee 3/18/2016 3/8/2017 Yes
Jesus Liranzo 3/8/2017 Yes
Wade Miley NA
Vladimir Nuno 5/31/2013 4/5/2015 Yes
Darren O'Day NA
Chris Tillman NA
Logan Verrett 6/7/2015 6/12/2016 3/30/2017 Yes
Tyler Wilson 3/28/2015 7/3/2016 Yes
Mike Wright 3/20/2015 6/2/2016 4/2/2017 Yes
Gabriel Ynoa 3/17/2015 3/15/2016 4/2/2017 Yes
Catchers 
Caleb Joseph 8/22/2016 Yes
Welungton Castillo NA
Infielders 
Chris Davis  NA
Ryan Flaherty  5+ Service
J.J. Hardy  NA
Manny Machado  Yes
Trey Mancini Yes
Jonathan Schoop  3/23/2013 Yes
Outfielders 
Craig Gentry 3/29/2016
Adam Jones  NA
Hyun Soo Kim Player Approval
Joey Rickard Yes
Anthony Santander Rule 5
Seth Smith NA
Mark Trumbo NA

13 December 2016

Arrivals and Departures (12/13/16): Post Winter Meeting World

The Orioles saw a flurry of activity last week that at first glance appears to be a shuffling of deck chairs on the U.S.S. Oriole.  Delving in a little deeper, there are justifications for each move.  A vacuum perspective finds that each of these new additions serve a need at a preferred cost.  That said, we do not live in a vacuum and moves in the previous weeks indicate that perhaps if the club was a bit more aggressive than maybe things would look a bit more shiny for 2017.  A few months remain to reconstitute this roster and there are players out there available for the taking.

That said, it is difficult not to notice around the AL East and see that each club is making significant additions.  The Yankees took on the formidable, but morally conflicting, Aroldis Chapman.  Boston decided to deal away near can't miss elite prospects in order to have and hold Chris Sale for three years.  The Blue Jays went to town with a Steve Pearce signing.  The Rays perhaps signed their greatest catcher ever in Wilson Ramos.  All were attached to other sizable moves that have yet to come to fruition.

For the Orioles, the rumor mill has circled the drain with fringe catchers in Nick Hundley and Welington Castillo and slightly splashier names in Michael Saunders and Ian Desmond.  That last one died a quick death as the Colorado Rockies signed Desmond to presumably and confusingly play first base.  The Orioles came out of the meetings with largely the same questions as they entered.  Who catches?  Who plays right field? And, perhaps, how does the pen get stronger?

Right field may have been answered with the Rule 5 acquisition of Anuery Tavarez, a 25yo left handed right fielder who had a cup of coffee in AAA last year.  He has largely existed outside of the world of prospect consideration, but showed a high contact rate, good speed, fringe power, and dependable defense.  Performance wise, he ended the year on a blistering pace while dominating right handed pitching in AA.  In an idea world, one could perhaps squint and see him as a dominant side platoon with Joey Rickard in right field.  However, be sure to take a breath because his breakout season last year was largely tied to a .381 BABIP.

More confusingly, the Orioles made a second selection in the Rule 5 by taking Cleveland's Anthony Santander.  Santander is raw.  Santander is not a right fielder.  Just 22, Santander has always had imposing power and a troubling injury history.  It appeared that he escaped the injury demon this year, but went under the knife to fix a shoulder injury in his throwing arm, which may sideline him into the year and perhaps make him fall under Rule 5 active roster rules in 2018 as well. 

Anyway, what once appeared to be a fringe defense right fielder has slid down the defensive spectrum to appear more like a first baseman with a very promising bat.  2016 saw him break out big with .204 ISO and a healthy 20 home run, 290/368/494 line in single A.  The basic word from scouts was that they would like to have him in their organization, but where do you keep him on an MLB roster and, especially, a playoff contending roster.

As we move forward, it is difficult to conclude that the club has answered any questions yet.  It is also difficult to conclude that the rumored additions the club is planning will make this team better than it was in 2016.  As we move into the middle of the offseason, a creeping awareness of the 2019 season is looming larger and larger.  The club as is really has not been constructed to be viable after 2018.  Contract status, free agent cost, and a dearth of talent in the minors really puts forward the importance of the next two years.  Perhaps, that is better left said a little further down the line though.

Below is the current 40 man roster with 37 out of 40 positions filled.

Options Remaining
 
Options
 
 
1
2
3
Pitchers 
Jayson Aquino 3/12/2014 3/7/2015 3/13/2016
Brad Brach 4/16/2012 5/18/2013 2/25/2014
Parker Bridwell 3/18/2016
Zach Britton  3/29/2011 6/6/2012 3/23/2013
Dylan Bundy  3/16/2013 3/14/2014 3/16/2015
Oliver Drake 3/15/2012 3/9/2015 3/31/2016
Yovani Gallardo 5+ Service
Jason Garcia 3/14/2016
Kevin Gausman 6/13/2013 3/29/2014 6/21/2015
Mychal Givens 6/25/2015
Joe Gunkel
Donnie Hart 7/24/2016
Ubaldo Jimenez 5+ Service
Chris Lee 3/18/2016
Jesus Liranzo
TJ McFarland 3/29/2014 4/5/2015 5/8/2016
Wade Miley 5+ Service
Darren O'Day 5+ Service
Chris Tillman 5+ Service
Tyler Wilson 3/28/2015 7/3/2016
Vance Worley 7/25/2010 3/18/2011 5/22/2013
Mike Wright 3/20/2015 6/2/2016
Catchers 
Caleb Joseph  
Francisco Pena 5/25/2016 3/22/2015 4/1/2016
Infielders 
Chris Davis  5+ Service
Ryan Flaherty  5+ Service
J.J. Hardy  5+ Service
Manny Machado 
Trey Mancini
Jonathan Schoop  3/23/2013
Outfielders 
Daniel Alvarez 3/29/2016
Adam Jones  5+ Service
Hyun Soo Kim Player Approval
Joey Rickard
Anthony Santander Rule 5
Anuery Tavarez Rule 5
Christian Walker 3/16/2015 3/26/2016

31 August 2015

Arrivals And Departures (8/31/15): 5% Is Not 5%

At least nice weather is coming...

This year the Orioles have diverged from T.S. Eliot: August is the cruelest month.  Through the heroics of Jason Garcia, the club saw their playoff chances rise as high as 36.2% according to Baseball Prospectus' Playoff Odds modeling.  However, that same modeling has now assessed their odds as below 5%.  In other words, there is still a chance, but four other clubs stand a better chance at snagging that last Wild Card entry.  Also note that this commentary does not include the results from Sunday's games.

If one only considers Games Back, it might still look competitive to some:

Rk     Tm W   L   W-L%   GB   Playoff %
1 KCR 80 49 .620 --- 100
2 TOR 73 56 .566 --- 100
3 HOU 72 58 .554 --- 98
4  NYY 71 57 .555 --- 96
5  TEX 67 61 .523 --- 49
6  MIN 66 63 .512 1.5 16
7  LAA 65 64 .504 3.5 17
8  TBR 63 66 .496 4.5 7
9  BAL 63 66 .496 4.5 4
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 8/30/2015.

However, I advise that one should consider playoff percentage as it also tries to account for team strength, opposition, and that other clubs are bunch in for the race.  The Orioles, 4.5 games back, have a considerably more difficult time leap frogging to the final Wild Card because they have to best four other clubs.  This is highly unlikely.  One might also remember that it was highly unlikely for the Yankees to crater and lose their first place spot to the Orioles.  At the time, their odds were a 75% chance of retaining that position.  However, they have given that placement to the Blue Jays for the time being.  Point being, we should not expect the Orioles to make the playoffs at this point, but we should also not be shocked if they do.  Pleasantly surprised, yes.  Shocked, no.

One might remember from previous statements of mine in various media that before a season begins I consider the season in play if a club has a playoff projection about 5%.  It might be confusing that that particular red line moves upward during the season for me.  It is not that 5% is not 5% is not 5%.  By definition, a 5% club in March has the same odds to make the playoffs as a 5% club at the end of August.  What differentiates the number for me is that a 5% club at the end of August has better evidenced itself as being a 5% club while one in March may experience certain luck (e.g., health, unexpected breakout seasons) and actually be a better team than initially projected.  Additionally, a 5% team in August has less time to improve itself through player acquisitions or uncover fast rising players in the upper minors.  Simply said, we know more about a club in August than we do in March, so I feel more comfortable accepting the projection model's odds and the lack of opportunity to improve the level of talent on the squad.

Looking at the legacy of the Showalter / Duquette era...

Boiling up over the past month, there has been a small, but vocal, subgroup of Oriole fandom that has firmly rooted itself into the belief that Buck Showalter needs to be fired.  Likewise, a season-long belief that somehow the organization was arrested from action due to the Toronto Blue Jays' inquiry on Dan Duquette has also firmly been entrenched by some as fault for the Orioles not making the playoffs.  These two ideas seem incredible to me.

Since 2012, the Orioles have been the winningest team in the American League with a record of 337 wins.  For perspective, from 2008 through 2011, the Orioles lost the most games in the American League with 380 losses.  Again, the current era turned the worst team in the league into the best team in the league in terms of overall multi-year performance.  That speaks to the overwhelming success that Baltimore has seen over the years.  Yet, somehow there is a vocal group that is very upset that the current club is 4.5 games outside of the playoffs.  That is a bit mind numbing.  This club has come so far that some have a Ricky Bobby perspective (If you're not first, you're last).

Showalter is highly esteemed for his ability to manage players and the respect his players show for him.  He is the quintessential manager any club would want helming their team.  I have yet to read any competent argument indicating otherwise.  The only points brought up have been the extent of "Buck looks lost" and "Buck cannot figure out how to win."  On the first point, that is pretty much just a collection of words people throw together when they feel something, but cannot find anything tangible to express that feeling.  One can simply ignore that as gibberish.  The latter, well, it is demonstrably false and also seems to fail in understanding how a baseball season can play out.

With respect to Duquette, I agree in that we should question his competency, but disagree that the will-he-leave-or-won't-he issue amounted to much.  Addressing the latter, a front office is a large collection of people and moving parts.  Duquette being considered for a different role would not prevent him in acting to better the club.  A firm payroll limit likely had more to do in hindering the club in improving its talent base.  The firm payroll limit was why the club decided to roll the dice with several fringe outfielders and hope for the best (an approach that worked amazingly well the previous three years).  In the end, it did not work out.  Sometimes the five or six players you collect wind up all crapping out.

Additionally, there has been some mumblings about Duquette not caring about the direction of the club which also seems demonstrably false.  The Jason Garcia situation seems to be the best example that the Orioles are interested in the future of this club.  Duquette is not maximizing this season to better himself on the way out.  Instead, he is holding on to a fringe power arm prospect to better the club's chances in future seasons.

However, I would like to introduce nuance and explain my displeasure with Duquette.  My concern is that the minor league system has not improved from MacPhail's tenure.  In fact, it is worse.  MacPhail had a system that was a collection of a couple shining elite prospects and a few second tier guys with one or two loud tools.  MacPhail also had a system that largely ignored international amateurs and publicly said that a club would be unwise to invest too much in that area.  All in all, the few shining prospects often placed the club around 10th best as a farm system.  Duquette's system has a couple injured elite prospects and a few second tier guys with low ceilings.  Duquette, who came in with an interest in attacking the foreign markets, has a system that largely ignores international amateur talent.  This system now finds itself as one of the worst in baseball.

From my perspective, spending a couple million here or there on guys like Delmon Young or Everth Cabrera was misguided.  I can understand maybe picking up one of them, but if that prevents you from bringing your international investment up to maximally allowed without incurring a penalty, then that appears to be a poor practice.  In effect, I think this results in the club unwilling to acquire top tier international talent as well as being unable to sign a bevy of hard throwing pitchers, which is a reason why Jason Garcia may be more important to the Baltimore organization than say another system with a firm international effort.  To be clear, the Orioles annually spend the least or second least money on international amateurs in all of Major League Baseball.  I have yet to see any evidence to show that this is a good approach to take.

Yes, I agree that when the playoff window is open that it is important to maximize your resources to push yourself through that window.  I contest that an extra two million is going to impact that window much.  Maybe it does.  Maybe it is too difficult to recognize who is a breakout two million dollar player and who is not, so it makes sense to collect as many as possible.  Maybe it makes sense to offer guaranteed contracts to pitchers or hitters who wind up being released in Spring Training.  I think it is an approach that has not worked and will unfortunately manifest itself in coming years to those who pay attention.

And now for Arrivals and Departures...
I think we can pass for now.  Maybe something fun happens today.