01 July 2016

Jonathan Schoop Is Crushing Ground Balls

The Orioles crush the ball when they make contact. Through 76 games, according to data via ESPN Stats and Information, they average a .361/.358/.628 line and a .427 wOBA when they put the ball into play, easily the best in the majors. Out of 169 qualified batters, while the Rockies have the top two players on the list (Story and CarGo), Chris Davis ranks third, Mark Trumbo ranks seventh and Manny ranks eighth. It’s fair to say that these three hitters are the heart of the Orioles’ offense. Then, while Wieters, Kim, Jones and Alvarez are all having strong years, it is arguable that Schoop has been the fourth best offensive piece.

Schoop is no exception to this rule. Respectably for a second baseman, Schoop ranks 35th in production on balls put into play. However, he is taking a surprising route to success. Chris Davis ranks 1st, Mark Trumbo ranks 8th and Manny Machado ranks 18th when putting pitches in the strike zone into play. Schoop has a .435 wOBA when putting pitches in the strike zone into play, good for only 73rd. Schoop has a .506 wOBA, good for second in the majors, when putting pitches out of the strike zone into play. In contrast, Manny Machado ranks 9th, Trumbo ranks 25th, and Davis ranks 142nd.

Schoop’s success against pitches out of the strike zone put into play is sparked in large part due to a high BABIP. He has a .315 BABIP when putting pitches in the strike zone into play, while having an absurd .442 BABIP against pitches out of the strike zone. Despite the fact that Schoop has more production hitting pitches out of the strike zone than in the strike zone, he has a 6.3% chance of hitting a home run when hitting a pitch in the strike zone compared to a 4.4% chance of hitting a home run when the pitch is out of the strike zone. Likewise, he has an 8.5% chance of hitting a double when hitting a pitch in the strike zone and an 5.2% chance when the pitch is out of the strike zone. It seems that he has had extreme success hitting singles, but only singles, against pitches out of the strike zone as he has a 33.3% chance of hitting a single on a pitch out of the strike zone compared to a 21% chance when the pitch is in the strike zone.

He isn’t getting better contact against pitches out of the strike zone. He hits 22% Line Drives, 36% Fly Balls and 41% Grounders when hitting pitches in the strike zone and 13% Line Drives, 20% Fly Balls and 62% Grounders when hitting pitches out of the strike zone. He’s just having a lot of success hitting ground balls when putting pitches out of the strike zone into play. He has a .289 wOBA when hitting a grounder on a pitch in the strike zone and a .396 wOBA (.429/.429/.464) when hitting a grounder on a pitch out of the strike zone. He’s only 22 for 72 with 3 doubles (4.2% double rate) on pitches in the strike zone that are grounders, but is 12 for 28 with 1 double (3.5% double rate) on pitches out of the strike zone that are grounders. According to this data set, he’s only hit 15 fly balls and line drives combined on pitches thrown out of the strike zone, and therefore it’s too small of a sample to derive anything meaningful.

Schoop’s .396 wOBA against grounders hit on pitches thrown out of the strike zone is second in the majors and is more than double the major league average of .185. Not only this, but a .396 wOBA would rank second in production for all ground balls hit regardless of if they're in the strike zone or not. It would only trail Ozuna’s .407 mark while being 166 points above the major league average of .230. Unsurprisingly, this has led him to being fifth in wOBA on ground balls in MLB this year. However, his .289 wOBA against grounders hit on pitches in the strike zone ranks 36th and is only 40 points above the major league average of .247.  It’s fascinating how he’s doing excellently hitting ground balls when a pitch is out of the strike zone, but is merely above average when hitting grounders when a pitch is in the strike zone.

Schoop needs to be successful when putting the ball into play because, as fellow author Elie wrote, he doesn’t walk. Schoop swings at over 60% of all pitches, which is the most of any batter in the majors. As a result, he only has a 30% called ball rate. It’s hard to walk when he doesn’t let pitchers throw him balls and therefore he only has a 3.7% walk rate and just a .119 wOBA (162nd out of 169) in plate appearances that result in a pitch being put into play. His offense comes from his ability to hammer the ball.

Furthermore, he needs to continue hammering pitches outside of the strike zone. If his ability to do that drops to just average, then his wOBA on pitches put into play will drop from .449 to .408 and his rank will drop from 35th to 69th. That means his overall wOBA will drop from .365 to .334 and his overall offensive rank will drop from 58th to 99th. In other words, his offensive performance will go from the 66th percentile to the 40th percentile so he’ll go from being above average to below average. Below average performance is acceptable from a second baseman, but it will certainly have an impact on the offense.

Then again, Schoop had significant success last season when putting pitches out of the strike zone into play. Indeed, last year he had a .358 wOBA when putting pitches out of the strike zone into play as ground balls. Maybe he is able to turn pitches in those areas into hard grounders that are more likely to become singles.

Looking at Statcast data from 2015-2016, he’s 23 for 42 with 2 reached on error and 3 doubles when he hits a ground ball over 100 miles per hour good for a .515 wOBA. He’s 10 for 25 with a reached on error and a double when he hits a ground ball between 95 and 100 good for a .371 wOBA. He’s 2 for 11 when he hits a grounder between 90 and 95 good for a .162 wOBA. He’s 9 for 32 with no errors and 1 double when he hits a ground ball between 80 and 90 good for a .262 wOBA.   He’s 8 for 50 with a sacrifice bunt and two reached on errors when he hits a grounder below 80 miles per hour good for a .142 wOBA. It’s clear that there’s a correlation between Schoop hitting a ground ball hard and getting a hit.  The Baseball Savant and the ESPN Stats and Information strike zones and pitch classification techniques are completely different and therefore I am unable to compare them to each other.

In general, batters do well when hitting ground balls harder than 100 mph. So far in 2016, they’re 2178 for 4990 good for a .436 batting average and a .471 slugging percentage. That's in the ballpark of 2,000 singles and 178 extra base hits. A batter that can do that will put up roughly a .400 wOBA. If Schoop can continue hammering groundballs at over 100 mph, then he may be able to keep up this performance.  But then again, why is he only able to hammer groundballs when they’re not in the strike zone? Plus he’s putting up a .515 wOBA compared to the average of .400. Is that luck or skill? I tend to think luck, but it could be a skill.

Schoop’s success this year has largely been due to getting singles when hitting groundballs on pitches thrown out of the strike zone. There is a decent year-to-year correlation when it comes to hitters’ production on pitches hit inside of the strike zone or for hitters’ production when they don’t put the ball into play but only a small one for pitches hit outside of the strike zone. This suggests that in general, hitters’ production on pitches outside of the strike zone is largely based on luck.

I tend to think that Schoop has been lucky this season and his offensive performance will soon regress to the mean. But he does have significant power and the tools to be an elite hitter. What happens if he can turn more of those 100 mph groundballs into 100 mph fastballs and line drives as he gets older? He might just have enough power to overcome his poor plate discipline.

2 comments:

Roger said...

I'm not sure why this result isn't intuitive. If Schoop's bat is crossing the plane of the plate at an excessive speed, he should hit the ball just as hard whether it's in or out of the strike zone (when he makes contact). I would expect hard ground balls on pitches out of the zone - especially when pitchers are trying to pitch to the bottom of the zone. I would then expect line drives and flyball HR's on pitches in the zone. Schoop seems to have an excellent batting eye for contact - an Adam Jones type. Jones gets a lot of infield hits on non-strikes. I just don't see this result as luck but expected based upon the type of hitter he is. He just does not normally make weak contact of any sort. Wouldn't the same arm strength that helps him throw like he does also help him make harder contact on any pitch - strike or not?

Matt Perez said...

Batters hit the ball harder when it's closer to the strike zone rather than when it is far away. It's easier to square up a pitch closer to the middle of the zone then one outside of it.

Schoop is 3 for 4 (with a double) on grounders up in the zone that are out of the strike zone this year. He's 4 for 15 on grounders low in the zone (no doubles) that are out of the strike zone. The definition I'm using is top third and bottom third respectively. So, that's clearly not happening.

Schoop doesn't have an excellent eye for contact. This year, he has a 32% chance of putting a pitch that he swings at into play. That ranks 143rd out of 168 (15th percentile). In contrast, Harper is at 39.2% and Trout is at 40%.

That's not necessarily a problem. Trumbo is doing worse this year. Desmond, Davis and Cargo are in the bottom ten. But that's not what we call an "excellent eye for contact". It's more like a willingness to flail at pitches and pray to hit one.

Jones ranks 91st out of 168th this year in average production against pitches out of the strike zone.

I'd expect Schoop to be able to hammer grounders in the strike zone if he can hammer them out of the strike zone. But even if he is able to hammer them, this kind of production is ridiculous.