Looking forward, it may be useful to try to envision who Mancini might well be. Using his current line:
Year | Age | Tm | PA | HR | BA | OBP | SLG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 | 24 | BAL | 15 | 3 | .357 | .400 | 1.071 |
2017 | 25 | BAL | 458 | 22 | .295 | .345 | .513 |
2 Yr | 2 Yr | 2 Yr | 473 | 25 | .297 | .347 | .531 |
162 | 162 | 162 | 628 | 33 | .297 | .347 | .531 |
I tried to find batters aged 25 with similar profiles. The closest statistical profiles I found were: Rico Brogna, Mike Young, Adrian Gonzalez, Miguel Cabrera, Richie Sexson, Mike Marshall, Cory Snyder, Stephen Drew (?), Raul Mondesi, and Al Martin. I used this population to predict the average outcome for Mancini each year. What we get is below:
Year | Age | PA | HR | AVG | OBP | SLG | WAR |
2018 | 26 | 515 | 22 | .269 | .332 | .468 | 2.3 |
2019 | 27 | 561 | 23 | .272 | .341 | .477 | 2.8 |
2020 | 28 | 538 | 21 | .274 | .350 | .468 | 2.8 |
2021 | 29 | 433 | 17 | .283 | .347 | .481 | 2.4 |
2022 | 30 | 485 | 18 | .267 | .337 | .455 | 2.1 |
2023 | 31 | 411 | 15 | .258 | .320 | .444 | 1.3 |
2024 | 32 | 417 | 14 | .251 | .318 | .424 | 1.0 |
2025 | 33 | 317 | 11 | .249 | .319 | .421 | 0.7 |
2026 | 34 | 310 | 8 | .227 | .291 | .363 | -0.2 |
2027 | 35 | 273 | 7 | .210 | .270 | .338 | -0.7 |
Now, what would an exceptional career look like? I took the above pool and cut it in half and kept the five players with the best career moving forward.What would a best outcome career look like? I took Miguel Cabrera, Adrian Gonzalez, Richie Sexson, Raul Mondesi, and Al Martin.
Year | Age | PA | HR | AVG | OBP | SLG | WAR |
2018 | 26 | 607 | 31 | .291 | .357 | .421 | 4.3 |
2019 | 27 | 617 | 30 | .284 | .366 | .518 | 4.7 |
2020 | 28 | 694 | 31 | .288 | .375 | .506 | 5.3 |
2021 | 29 | 483 | 23 | .304 | .371 | .538 | 4.0 |
2022 | 30 | 625 | 28 | .277 | .353 | .488 | 3.7 |
2023 | 31 | 644 | 26 | .272 | .335 | .479 | 3.1 |
2024 | 32 | 554 | 21 | .270 | .344 | .463 | 2.8 |
2025 | 33 | 424 | 18 | .268 | .348 | .462 | 2.1 |
2026 | 34 | 425 | 13 | .242 | .313 | .396 | 0.5 |
2027 | 35 | 332 | 9 | .228 | .297 | .372 | -0.1 |
That would be a stunning career and one that would keep the playoff window open for the club in the years to come. That said, let's do a different sub-grouping. That sub-grouping would be the low walk, high strikeout group: Raul Mondesi, Cory Snyder, Richie Sexson, Rico Brogna, and Mike Marshall.
Year | Age | PA | HR | AVG | OBP | SLG | WAR |
2018 | 26 | 487 | 24 | .259 | .311 | .471 | 1.8 |
2019 | 27 | 549 | 22 | .264 | .310 | .456 | 1.6 |
2020 | 28 | 556 | 24 | .256 | .323 | .458 | 2.1 |
2021 | 29 | 410 | 16 | .265 | .321 | .456 | 1.5 |
2022 | 30 | 474 | 18 | .253 | .326 | .444 | 1.6 |
2023 | 31 | 353 | 14 | .243 | .309 | .433 | 0.7 |
2024 | 32 | 383 | 13 | .233 | .296 | .400 | 0.2 |
2025 | 33 | 245 | 6 | .216 | .278 | .343 | -0.5 |
2026 | 34 | 265 | 7 | .199 | .255 | .329 | -0.9 |
2027 | 35 | 278 | 7 | .189 | .244 | .312 | -1.4 |
Let us pretend I did not run those numbers. However, he would still be a useful role player.
2 comments:
In predicting a players future outcome, wouldn't a considerable factor be the level of consistency? What we have learned so far in Trey's early career is that his production level hasn't experienced much change in variation over the course of the season. He's a pretty steady hitter posting an OPS of .892 in the first half vs a .815 OPS during the second half. Very small sample size of course, but he has avoided multiple slumps which is a good sign.
Compare his production to that of a streak hitter like Chris Davis, who seemingly turns hot or cold depending on which half the season he's playing in or even from month to month. This has been the case with Chris for most of his career, save the 2014 season where he was just consistently terrible. It's all panned out to a career slash line of .248/.329/.493.
Shouldn't Trey's early consistency play up to a more favorable future production line?
True, a season is an arbitrary time frame and one can seek different lengths of resolution. That said, there is evidence that suggests big second halfs do not change projection paths. Knowing that, I doubt a lack of slumps means anything different. However, I would suggest that Mancini has experienced a couple slumps with a length of a couple weeks.
Post a Comment