After finally breaking through in 2012, Chris Tillman continued
to excel and has been the Orioles’ ace for the past two years. And the fact that
Wei-Yin Chen and Bud Norris can both become free agents after this year only
increases Chris Tillman’s importance to this franchise. So, it should come as
no surprise that Joel Sherman of the New York Post claims that the Orioles and
Chris Tillman are trying to see if they can reach a long-term agreement.
The only question is what a long-term extension for Tillman might look like and
whether it makes sense for the club.
Generally speaking, the closer a pitcher is to arbitration
the more money he’ll receive for his arbitration-eligible years. For example,
Chris Archer is only expected to earn $13.75 million for his second, third, and
fourth year of arbitration (I’m excluding his Super Two year in order to use
three years of arbitration for everyone) while Jose Quintana is expected to
earn over $18 million for his three years of arbitration. This makes sense because pitchers do get hurt
and the further away a pitcher is to being arbitration eligible the less likely
he’ll actually get there. That means when comparing what Tillman might sign to
other pitchers it’s important to keep service time in mind.
Fortunately, earlier this year both Lance Lynn and Wade
Miley signed extensions. Like Tillman, both starters had just become
arbitration eligible and will become free agents after three years. Lance Lynn
signed a three-year, $22 million dollar contract while Wade Miley signed a three-year,
$19.25 million dollar contract with a $12 million dollar club option for a
fourth year.
Chris Tillman has a worse FIP and lower WAR since 2011 than the other two. However, he’s had a similar ERA and about as many
wins as the other two pitchers with considerably fewer losses. Many people
argue that Chris Tillman is able to outperform his FIP due to his ability to
hold runners as well as pitch differently when men are on base. If you believe
that his FIP doesn’t tell the full story then one can argue that he’s nearly as
good as Lynn and even better than Miley especially given that Tillman pitched
in the AL East. It certainly helps Tillman’s case that he’s shown significant
improvement lately while Miley has begun to regress. Given that Tillman and the Orioles
agreed that Tillman should earn $4.35 million this year, it certainly seems
that the Orioles believe that he’s better than his FIP. He's certainly being paid like it.
I think most people would agree that Lance Lynn has been better
than Tillman both over their entire careers and in 2014. Therefore, I doubt
that Tillman could earn as much as Lynn will over the next three years. But I
do think it’s possible to argue that Tillman has been better than Wade Miley.
If so, this suggests that Tillman should earn about $20 million for his three
years of arbitration and that a potential deal could consist of his three years of arbitration
as well as a possible club option for about $12.5 to $13 million dollars.
What if the Orioles decide that a three-year extension that
primarily covers Tillman’s arbitration years simply isn’t good enough? The
Orioles may feel that such an extension might save them a few million dollars
but simply isn’t worth the risk unless they can sign a deal that keeps Tillman
under control for a few extra free agent years. How might a longer deal look?
It’s important to note that Chris Tillman will turn 27 years old
at the beginning of the 2015 season which means he won’t be eligible for free
agency until he’s 30 even if he doesn’t sign away any of his free agent years.
It also means he probably won’t be interested in a long-term extension that
considerably delays when he can become a free agent. James Shields became a
free agent this year at 33 and found it hard to find a suitable contract
because teams were nervous about his age. It makes sense that Chris Tillman
wouldn’t want to put himself into the same position and therefore would
probably be unwilling to sign a deal any longer than four guaranteed years with
one club option.
That may determine the length but how much money should he receive? Julio Teheran received $16.6 million
for his three arbitration years plus $11 million for one free agent year and a
club option for $12 million. Chris Sale earned $18.6 million for his three
arbitration years plus $12 million for one free agent year and club options for
$12.5 and $13.5 million. Gio Gonzalez received $18 million for his three arbitration
years plus $23 million for two free agent years and a club option for $12
million. Based on those numbers, it would be reasonable to expect Tillman to
earn about $20 million for his three arbitration years, $12.5 million for a
free agent year and $13.5 million for a club option. It's important to realize that the other deals listed happened in previous years and therefore we should expect some inflation.
If history is any guide, I would expect an extension for Tillman
to range for anywhere between three years and $20 million to four years and $32.5
million with a club option for $13.5 million.
Tillman has been the Orioles’ ace
for the past two years. Since the Orioles probably aren’t going to be signing
any top free agent starters in the near future, it makes sense to try to keep
their homegrown products for as long as possible without paying full price. So, I think that any extension would require Tillman to give the Orioles an extra year of control.
I wouldn't recommend a
three-year extension that doesn't cover any free agent years because I think that would at most save the Orioles a
few million. Such an extension has limited benefits and therefore isn't really worth the risk. If the Orioles are going to extend Tillman then they need to gain a year or two of control. That's why if Tillman would be willing
to sign a contract that contains a free agent year as well as give the Orioles a club
option then I think I’d have to recommend it. Otherwise, I'd pass.
2 comments:
I think I do not understand. Tillman has two more years of arbitration left, so that looks like a payout of about 15 million total in those two years. On top of that we are probably seeing a fair market value cost of about 10-15 million for that third season. SO we are talking about 3/25-30 not 3/20. Are you including this season in the numbers? Why? This contract is already in place, right? So, an extension would be beyond this upcoming year.
I'm including this year in the numbers. The Dozier extension announced today also included this year despite both sides agreeing on a contract. Generally speaking, most long-term contracts signed before the season starts usually result in ripping up previous agreed upon amounts (see Kipnis and Gyorko). Then again, others like Aybar who signed an extension around this point decided not to include the upcoming year in an extension.
It is reasonable to not include this season in the numbers. If so, then the length of any extension should be reduced by 1 year and the amount should be reduced by about $4.5 million so that we'd be talking 2/15.5 instead of 3/20.
Post a Comment