Spring training has begun and after an off-season filled
with signings, rumored signings, re-signings rumored trades and agreements that
may or may not have existed and fallen through, the Orioles lineup has begun
to come into focus. Barring a last minute
signing of someone like Austin Jackson or Pedro Alvarez or a trade for the
likes of Jay Bruce (one of which will inevitably happen the minute I submit
this article) we can make a decent guess at the Orioles starters and how
they’ll line up. With that in mind it
seems like as good a time as any to inspect that lineup and try to project how
it ranks against the rest of Major League Baseball.
A couple of notes before I dive in: First, I tried to be as objective as possible
in doing this evaluation. This time of
year in particular I tend to see everything through rose-colored glasses, but
any ideas I have about Jonathan Schoop hitting 35 home runs or Manny Machado
winning an MVP award aren’t particularly useful from an analytical point of
view as I’m neither a professional scout nor an expert in statistical
analysis. So for this piece I’ll be
dealing with only commonly available projections, specifically ZiPS and
Steamer. And to keep everything as
simple as possible, I’ll just be looking at wRC+, an explanation of which can
be found here. If
you are unfamiliar, wRC+ is a stat that measures a player’s total offensive
value, with 100 being league average.
Finally, this is my best guess at what the Orioles most
frequent lineup will look like (and not necessarily what I think it should be). Obviously, the Orioles will like use many lineup variations over the course of the year, but this seems like the best
place to start. With that in mind, let’s dig in.
Batting First:
75th percentile: 115 50% 101 25%: 92
Orioles 2015: 122 (5th of 30)
Manny Machado (Projected wRC+: 129)
Machado held down this lineup slot for almost all of 2015,
registering 496 PA from the top of the lineup, supplemented by a scattering of
appearances from Nolan Reimold (86 PA), Alejandro De Aza (68) and a scattering
of others. Though is future might well
be as a middle-of-the-order hitter, Machado will likely return to the lead-off
spot this year and it’s actually a hat he wears pretty well; in 2016 he was 2nd
on the team in OBP, 1st in
steals and 2nd in extra base hits.
His 2016 projection of 129 wRC+ is more than solid for a lead-off hitter
and (before accounting for at-bats accrued by others) would give the Orioles
the best wRC+ for the lead-off spot.
Batting Second:
75%: 120 50%: 105 25%: 94
Orioles 2015: 93 (24th of 30)
Hyun Soo Kim (Projected wRC+: 106)
The second spot was a big problem area for the Orioles
last year. Jimmy Paredes (202 PA batting second) got off to a hot start but
regressed in a huge way as the season progressed and stumbled across the finish
line. Gerardo Parra inherited the lion’s
share of the at-bats after the trading deadline but he disappointed, failing to
match the level of production he achieved in Milwaukee. Overall, the Orioles #2 hitters ranked near
the bottom of the league; their cumulative 93 wRC+ put them 24th of
30. This year, I’m projecting Korean
free agent acquisition Hyun-Soo Kim to get the bulk of the at-bats in the 2
hole. Translating Korean stats to the
Major Leagues is an inexact science, but projection models are fairly bullish
on Kim. He projects for 106 wRC+, which
would put the Orioles right in the middle of the pack at 15th of
30.
Batting Third
75%: 134 50%: 120 25%: 107
Orioles 2015: 120 (Tied 14th)
Adam Jones (Projected wRC+: 110)
Jones has occupied the third spot for most of his career
as an Oriole and there’s every reason to assume that continues into 2016. Jones
registered 111 wRC+, which is significantly below the 50th
percentile among major league 3rd hitters, but the team got strong
contributions from occasional #3 hitters Chris Davis and Manny Machado to
finish right in the middle of the pack.
Steamer and ZIPs both think Jones holds right around his 2015 number
again in 2016. Jones isn’t an ideal #3
hitter- he’d be very strong in the 5th or 6th spot- but
short of moving Machado or Chris Davis (and weakening the 1st or 4th
spots) he is the Orioles best option here.
Batting Fourth
75%: 132 50%: 111 25%: 106
Orioles 2015: 134 (6th)
Chris Davis (Projected wRC+: 134)
After a protracted contract negotiation and one-team
bidding war, Chris Davis returns as the Orioles clean-up hitter and he’s a good
one. Davis was a monster last year
slugging 47 home runs and scoring a wRC+ of 147 as the Orioles primary clean-up
hitter. Orioles clean-up hitters as a
group scored a healthy 134, good for 6th place out of 30 major
league teams. Davis projects right at
that same 134 again, a healthy but slightly regressed number for him that would
again put the Orioles in the 80th percentile of the entire league.
Batting Fifth
75%: 115 50%: 100 25%: 89
Orioles 2015: 107 (11th)
Mark Trumbo (Projected wRC+: 108)
Trumbo, Matt Wieters and a sampling of others will likely
occupy this spot, depending on who is hot and who is pitching, but in the name
of simplicity, I’m slotting Trumbo here in the 5th spot. Wieters was the most common #5 hitter for the
team last year, but with only 191 PA and the 5-hole’s production got a healthy
assist from early season Chris Davis appearances to end up at 107 wRC+, 11th
best in the majors. Trumbo projects
right at that same level (108).
Batting Sixth
75%: 102 50%: 91 25%: 80
Orioles 2015: 76 (26th)
Matt Wieters (Projected wRC+: 94)
This is where things started to get hairy for the Orioles
in 2015. The first five spots were relatively strong but the bottom half of the
lineup was a catastrophe, largely due to the major holes offensive holes at
DH, right field, left field, short stop and 2nd base prior to Schoop’
s return. The 6th spot,
occupied most frequently by JJ Hardy but really by no-one on a consistent basis
compiled a wRC+ of 76, ranking a dismal 26th of 30 teams. Things are looking up slightly heading in to
2016. Matt Wieters accepted the
qualifying offer to return and looks to be healthy heading into spring
training. His projection of wRC+ of 94 isn’t world-beating by any stretch, but
would be good enough to move the Orioles into the top half of the league and
represent a significant improvement.
Batting Seventh
75%: 101 50%: 86 25%: 78
Orioles 2015: 66 (30th)
Jonathan Schoop (Projected wRC+: 94)
Orioles 7th hitters were there worst in the
majors last year (see what I mean about the bottom of the lineup being a catastrophe?). Like the 6th spot, this was
another revolving door with JJ Hardy getting the most at-bats (his bat really
was a big problem last year, more on that later). For 2016, I’m projecting Jonathan Schoop into
this lineup spot, though he could foreseeably end up hitting anywhere from 6th
to 9th depending on how Buck wants to stack it up. It’s an article of faith among many Orioles
fans that Schoop is a potential all-star on the verge of a break-out campaign
after he posted a very solid 112 wRC+ in 321 trips to the plate in 2015. That very well might be the case, but so far
the projection models aren’t seeing it, deterred by his K-to-BB% (an ugly
24.6-2.8) and high BABIP. Still, his average projection of 94 puts is
positively Ruthian relative to last year’s #7 hitters and would put the Orioles
a much improved 10th in the majors.
Batting Eighth
75%: 91 50%: 81 25%: 68
Orioles 2015: 60 (26th)
JJ Hardy (Projected wRC+:
72)
Notice the trend?
The bottom of the Orioles lineup really was a sinkhole for most of last
season. Hardy, Ryan Flaherty and Caleb Joseph hit from this spot a roughly
equal number of times in 2015, but with their results ranging from bad to
abominable. I’m plugging Hardy in here
for the purpose of this analysis. He
really should probably be the 9th hitter, regardless of who plays
right field, but I think the Orioles keep him out of the 9th spot to
start, out of respect for his reputation.
Hardy projects for 72 wRC+, somewhat of a dead cat bounce from the
career low 49 he posted in 2015). The
Orioles are hoping for a bigger bounce back from a hopefully-healthy Hardy, but
it’s very possible he’s in a similar spot to Brian Roberts a few years ago,
where a series of injuries have obscured or excused a drop in performance that
has just as much to do with natural aging.
Hardy’s lineup spot is safe though, as his solid glove work makes him a
respectable option at SS for at least a bit longer. His projection of 72 wRC+ would put the
Orioles 20th of 30 for the 8 spot.
Batting Ninth
75%: 74 50%: 72 25%: 65
Orioles 2015: 74 (Tied 4th of 14 AL Teams)
Nolan Reimold (Projected wRC+: 81) among others
The ninth spot falls to the right fielder, whoever that
ends up being. I suspect it will be a
revolving door this year, at least until someone emerges as the leader of the
pack at that position. Orioles 9th
place hitters actually performed reasonably well relative to the rest of the AL
in 2015, led by a strong performance by Caleb Joseph from that spot. Candidates this year include Reimold, Joey
Rickard (78 Projected wRC+) and Dariel Alvarez (a surprising 93!) among a score
of other internal and external candidates.
Summary:
wRC+ by Lineup Spot
#
|
75%
|
50%
|
25%
|
2015 Orioles
|
2016 Player
|
2016 Proj.
|
1
|
115
|
101
|
92
|
122 – 5th
|
Machado – 3B
|
129 (1st)
|
2
|
120
|
105
|
94
|
93 – 24th
|
Kim – LF
|
106 (15th)
|
3
|
134
|
120
|
107
|
120 – Tied `14th
|
Jones – CF
|
110 (22nd)
|
4
|
132
|
111
|
106
|
134 – 6th
|
Davis – 1B
|
134 (6th)
|
5
|
115
|
110
|
89
|
107 – 11th
|
Trumbo – DH
|
108 (11th)
|
6
|
102
|
91
|
80
|
76 – 26th
|
Wieters – C
|
94 (15th)
|
7
|
101
|
86
|
78
|
66 – 30th
|
Schoop – 2B
|
94 (T-9th)
|
8
|
91
|
81
|
68
|
60 – 26th
|
Hardy – SS
|
72 (T-20th)
|
9*
|
94
|
72
|
65
|
74 – 4th (of 15)
|
Reimold - RF
|
81 (4th)
|
The projected Orioles lineup is very solid. They are above the league median at 7 of 9
positions and 25th percentile or better for 3. The current lineup compares favorably to
last year’s edition, which accumulated a wRC+ of 94 (21st in the
league) but over-performed that number to score 713 runs (9th best
in baseball). With a decent run of health, this year’s squad should be better
on the basis of more depth. Healthier
seasons from Schoop and Hardy mean less plate appearances for Ryan Flaherty
(wRC+ of 71) and the additions of Trumbo and Kim hopefully add stability and
competency to positions that were revolving doors of disaster in 2015.
This is not, however, an “elite” lineup, at least as it
presents according to projections. Only
Machado and Davis are particular standouts relative to their counterparts
across the league. Some of previous years problems- high strikeout
rates, low on-base percentage- will likely continue to 2016 but on the bright
side, so will the strengths (home runs, and lots of them). Taken as a whole, it appears we’re looking at
a better version of last year’s offense, but likely not enough improved (on its
own) to take the Orioles from 81 wins to where they would like to be in
competing for a division title.
Good analysis. Thanks for the comparisons. Maybe the next post could be how to make this lineup better. I realize the wRC+ lines up really well this way, but I think Reimold is a candidate for a breakout season as a leadoff hitter. A Markakis-type leadoff. If he can get to wRC+ of 100 to give as an average leadoff hitter, we can move Machado to third, Davis to fifth and Trumbo to seventh (Schoop at 8th and Hardy at 9th). THEN the lineup looks much more elite even if the other predictions are used as is. I really think the O's could go this direction with either Reimold or Rickard.
ReplyDeleteOf course, that's why Fowler WAS a big deal...... not just for the wRC+ prediction but because of what he could do for the rest of the lineup positions.
We ran that last Monday.
ReplyDeleteI can't make myself expect or entertain the Reimold breakout at this point, but I have liked him as a player since he debuted. If we're looking for a wild-card in the right field spot, I was surprised that Dariel Alvarez projected very similar to Austin Jackson offensively. But that might say more about Jackson than Alvarez.
ReplyDeleteReimold is a JOKE, a one year, brittle flash in the pan, why not bring back Mark Hendrickson while we are at it, for Chrissakes, as Earl would say!
ReplyDeletereimold must have his brothers on here!
ReplyDeleteI knew my Reimold suggestion would bring the trolls out. But I'm not sure that Pedro Alvarez is a better answer. Can't see right now how this lineup plays out except for Machado to lead off. Alvarez will have to bet eighth (and Hardy ninth) to make it all L-R-L-R.
ReplyDeleteThere's no way Alvarez should bat eighth against right-handed pitching.
ReplyDeleteIt's either Wieters or Alvarez at 8th. Buck will only bat L-R-L-R. I think he will be loyal to Wieters at 6th but that is the only other way. Do you see any other option to keep Buck's normal pattern?
ReplyDeleteAlvarez is HOF worthy compared to Reimold!!!
ReplyDeleteCould always bat Alvarez second.
ReplyDeleteAlvarez doesn't make enough contact to bat second. I'd rather have Wieters batting second as a switch hitter. Then you could put Alvarez at 6th and Kim at 8th.
ReplyDeleteAgree to disagree, then. I'd rather have the better hitter higher in the order.
ReplyDeleteWieters is not the better hitter? Alvarez's BA and OBP suck. He must be in the lower part of the order solely for the purpose of driving
ReplyDeleteWieters is a platoon hitter. He struggles greatly against right handers. Alvarez is a platoon hitter. He excels against right handers.
ReplyDeleteThe difference is the O's will likely use Alvarez as a platoon bat. They have never used Wieters that way.
ReplyDelete